Gavel Workflows just got a major redesign. Get 40% OFF your first month →
Products
Resources
Case Studies
Plans & Pricing
Case Studies
Plans & Pricing
Log InGet a Demo
Get Started
No Credit Card Required
Documate is now Gavel! Read more about why we’re excited about this rebrand.
RESOURCES
Guides
Building the Best Playbooks in Gavel Exec
Guides

Building the Best Playbooks in Gavel Exec

To get the most value out of Gavel Exec, your Playbooks should work like clear, issue-specific checklists for the AI, just like training a junior associate. The best Playbooks break down each legal concern into focused Rules, with detailed guidance in the Rule Description to help the AI know what to look for, where to look, and how to evaluate it. This guide shows you how to name and structure each Rule, write strong descriptions, and use examples to get precise, reliable results, clause by clause.

By the team at Gavel
July 25, 2025
Cut drafting time by 90%

Easy intake and document automation to auto-populate your templates.

Playbooks in Gavel Exec help you automate contract review by teaching the AI how to spot and respond to specific issues, just like a junior associate following your exact instructions. To get the most accurate and helpful results, you need to break down your Rules and Rule Descriptions with precision.

This guide explains how to structure your Playbook effectively so the AI knows exactly what to look for, where to look, and what to do when it finds (or doesn’t find) something.

Step 1: Create One Rule per Issue

Each Rule should focus on a single issue. If an issue shows up in different forms or in multiple clauses, create separate Rules for each variation. This lets the AI apply narrower logic and respond more accurately. Why? LLMs work best when the instruction is clear, targeted, and unambiguous. Combining too many concerns in one Rule reduces precision and increases hallucination risk.

Example: Proprietary Information in Consulting Agreements

Breaking up rules that relate to a specific clause will get you the best results.

In this case, breaking down the overarching “Proprietary Info” concern into subtopics (assignment, confidentiality, return obligations) gives the AI clearer instructions and ensures nothing is missed.

Step 2: Write a Strong Rule Description

The Rule Description is where you “train” the AI for that Rule. Think of it like giving a paralegal step-by-step instructions. The best Rule Descriptions contain three elements:

1. Start with a Blanket Statement

Tell the AI what the rule is looking for in plain terms, e.g., “This Rule checks whether the agreement requires the consultant to assign all IP to the company.”

2. Tell It Where to Look

Guide the AI to the right section using contextual cues like clause headers or common clause positions. This reduces false positives.

“This clause usually appears under a section titled ‘Intellectual Property,’ ‘Ownership,’ or ‘Work Product.’ It may be near the end of the agreement.”

3. Provide Examples or Fallback Clauses

Give good versions (what should be there) and red-flag versions (what shouldn’t be there) to help the AI benchmark.

“Acceptable fallback language includes:

  • ‘Consultant hereby assigns all right, title, and interest in any Work Product to Company.’
  • ‘All intellectual property created in connection with this agreement shall be the sole property of Company.’

Problematic language includes:

  • ‘Consultant retains all intellectual property rights unless otherwise agreed.’”

Example of a Complete Rule

Rule Name: Proprietary Info: Assignment Clause

Rule Description:

This Rule checks whether the consultant is required to assign all intellectual property created under the agreement to the company. This clause typically appears under “Ownership,” “Intellectual Property,” or “Work Product.” Look for phrases indicating an obligation to assign rights to the company.

Acceptable language might include:

- “Consultant agrees to assign all right, title, and interest in any inventions or work product…”

- “All IP created by Consultant shall be owned exclusively by Company.”

Red flags include:

- “Consultant retains ownership of their ideas.”

- Lack of any assignment language at all.

Tips for Writing Strong Rules

Tips for prompting your legal AI playbook.

When to Combine or Split Rules

Use your judgment, but if a clause can fail in multiple distinct ways, it’s often better to create separate Rules for each scenario.

Example: Indemnification

  • Rule 1: “Does the indemnity clause cover third-party IP claims?”
  • Rule 2: “Is the indemnity mutual, or only one-sided?”
  • Rule 3: “Is the standard of fault (e.g., negligence, willful misconduct) clearly stated?”

These could be combined if you're doing a general review, but separating them lets you track and flag each issue more precisely.

To build the best Playbooks in Gavel Exec:

  • Break each issue into one Rule per risk type
  • Use the Rule Description to train the AI like a paralegal
    • Start with a clear goal
    • Guide it to the right place in the doc
    • Offer sample clauses (good and bad)

When done right, your Playbook becomes a reliable AI reviewer that mirrors your legal instincts, creates the best outcomes for your deal, and gets you to the redlined and final version of the document faster.

Get 15 free redlines when you download Gavel Exec today.

Lorem ipsume torid noris

Lorem ipusme candorn idume noris cantor dolor canrium shaw eta elium aloy. Lorem ipusme candorn idume noris.

Start a free trial
7 day trial • No credit card required
News

Gavel Workflows Just Got a Major Redesign

To celebrate, enjoy 40% off your first month with code WORKFLOWS40. This is a limited-time offer that won't return anytime soon. First-time customers only. Offer ends September 30th at 11:59 PM PT.

Read More
Guides

Four Contract Playbook Best Practices for Modern Legal Teams in 2025

Turn your contract playbook into a real advantage—learn 4 ways top legal teams make theirs faster, smarter, and easier to use every day.

Read More
Articles

How I Use AI to Review Data Protection Agreements (and Why You Might Want To)

AI can speed up the review of complex Data Protection Agreements by flagging risky or unclear clauses before they become problems. With AI, you can run your own playbook directly in Word, instantly spotting issues like vague processing purposes, missing security measures, or weak liability terms.

Read More

Supercharge your practice with bi-weekly tips.

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive legal tech trends, automation guides, customer interviews, and more.

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.