Document Automation
Product features
By practice area
By company size
Contract Review
PRODUCT FEATURES
Resources
LearN
Case Studies
Pricing
Six AI contract review tools for teams evaluating Ivo, compared on who builds the playbooks, Microsoft Word support, published pricing and trial access.
The main Ivo alternatives are Gavel Exec, LegalOn, Spellbook, GC AI, Harvey and Legora. Ivo is an enterprise contract intelligence platform for in-house teams, with playbooks built alongside its legal engineering team and pricing quoted through a demo. If you want to write and change playbooks yourself and see a price first, Gavel Exec ($160 per user per month) and GC AI ($500 per month for one user) publish prices and offer trials without a sales call.
Last checked October 28, 2026. Gavel publishes this comparison and makes Gavel Exec. Competitor details come from each vendor's website unless marked otherwise. Prices and features change, so confirm current terms with each vendor.
Ivo
Gavel Exec
Gavel Exec is AI contract review, redlining, and drafting software for legal teams. It works in Microsoft Word and online, so attorneys can review contracts inside Word or use browser-based workflows for broader contract analysis.
Gavel Exec supports playbook-based review, redlining, drafting, benchmarking, batch analysis, and multi-document comparison. Playbooks can be generated with AI, built from uploaded files, created manually, or started from built-in playbooks created by practicing attorneys. Gavel Exec publishes pricing at $160 per user per month or $1,740 per user annually, and offers 25 free queries per user with no credit card required.
| Feature | Ivo | Gavel Exec |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Billing | ||
| Free Trial | ||
| AI Features | ||
| Playbooks | ||
| Word Integration | ||
| Support |
What each vendor publishes about where its tool runs, how playbooks get built, pricing and trials.
| Tool | Best for | Where it runs | Who builds playbooks | Price | Free trial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivo (for reference) | Enterprise in-house teams | Word, Google Docs and web | Generated from your contracts, with Ivo's legal engineering team | Not published | Demo |
| Gavel Exec | In-house teams and law firms that want self-serve setup | Word add-in and web app | Your lawyers: built-in attorney playbooks, or generate from your documents and edit | $160 per user per month, or $1,740 per user per year | 25 free queries per user, no credit card |
| LegalOn | In-house departments that want pre-built content | Web app and Word | 135+ pre-built by LegalOn's attorneys; Playbook Agent for your own | Not published; per seat, quoted by demo | Not stated |
| Spellbook | Transactional lawyers at firms and in-house | Word add-in; Google Docs | Your team, with a build service on in-house plans | Not published; about $350 per user per month reported by Gavel customers | 7 days |
| GC AI | Solo and fractional general counsel | Web app and Word add-in | Your team; Skill Library | $500 per month (Individual); Team on request | 14 days, no credit card |
| Harvey | Large law firms and corporate legal teams | Web; Word and Outlook add-ins | Configured for your organization | Not published | Demo |
| Legora | Law firms and in-house teams | Web; Word and Outlook add-ins | Your team sets starting positions and red lines | Not published | Demo |
Teams usually compare Ivo alternatives over three things: how fast they can change a playbook, what it costs, and whether they need enterprise contract intelligence at all.
Best for: in-house teams and law firms that want to set up and change playbooks themselves, without an implementation project.
Gavel Exec is AI contract review and drafting software that runs inside Microsoft Word as an add-in and on the web. Any lawyer on the team can create or edit a playbook: start from built-in playbooks written by practicing attorneys, generate rules from a checklist, spreadsheet playbook or set of signed agreements, then share with read-only or edit access.
Limits: no Google Docs support, and no contract repository or post-signature analytics. See Ivo vs Gavel Exec for the side-by-side.
Best for: in-house departments that want attorney-written playbooks ready to use.
LegalOn ships 135+ pre-built playbooks written by its attorneys and works on the web and in Microsoft Word. Its Playbook Agent builds playbooks from your templates and prior redlines. Like Ivo, it has added a repository (Vault) and cross-document review, and it serves teams from solo attorneys to large departments.
Limits: no published price; we found no benchmarking against external market data. See LegalOn alternatives.
Best for: law firms and in-house teams doing high-volume transactional work in Word.
Spellbook calls itself "the #1 AI contract review platform for transactional lawyers." It runs in Word, lists Google Docs among its integrations, and offers Review, Draft, Ask, Playbooks and Compare to Market, which benchmarks against data from similar agreements. In October 2026 it released Autonomous Contract Management, a repository product.
Limits: no published price. See Spellbook alternatives.
Best for: general counsel and small legal teams who want a published price and a quick trial.
GC AI is "the legal AI for in-house counsel," with a web app, a Microsoft Word add-in, and connections to Gmail, Slack, Google Drive and HubSpot. Teams write their own playbooks, and its Skill Library covers workflows such as MSAs and DPAs.
Limits: in-house only, and we found no market benchmarking. See GC AI alternatives.
Best for: large law firms and corporate legal teams that want one AI platform across practices.
Harvey runs on the web with Word and Outlook add-ins, applies playbooks in Word, and handles bulk review in Vault projects of up to 10,000 documents. It reports use at 80% of Am Law 100 firms.
Limits: enterprise sales process and no self-serve trial. See Harvey vs Gavel Exec.
Best for: law firms and in-house teams that want review, research and drafting in one shared workspace.
Legora's Word add-in drafts, redlines and reviews inside the document, its playbooks let you set starting positions and red lines, and Tabular Review runs questions across many documents.
Limits: no published price or self-serve trial. See Legora vs Gavel Exec.
A vendor-built playbook gets you a polished starting point, but every later change runs through the vendor or an admin. A self-serve playbook takes your lawyers an afternoon to set up, and after that they can change a position the same day it changes in negotiation.
More comparisons: Spellbook alternatives, LegalOn alternatives, GC AI alternatives, the best AI contract review tools for lawyers and all Gavel comparisons.
Build and edit playbooks yourself, redline in Microsoft Word, and see the price up front. 25 free queries per user, no credit card.
For teams that want to build and change playbooks themselves and see a price first, Gavel Exec is the closest fit. For in-house departments that want a large library of pre-built playbooks, LegalOn is the usual comparison.
Ivo doesn't publish pricing; you get a quote through a demo. Gavel Exec is $160 per user per month, or $1,740 per user per year.
Ivo says it's designed for "in-house legal teams, not law firms." Gavel Exec, Spellbook, Harvey and Legora serve both law firms and in-house teams.
Yes, with self-serve tools. In Gavel Exec any lawyer can create a playbook from built-in defaults, generate one from your documents, or write rules by hand, and edit it later without admin help.
We didn't find a self-serve trial; Ivo's evaluation starts with a demo. Gavel Exec gives each user 25 free queries with no credit card.
Ivo works in Word and Google Docs. Among the alternatives here, Spellbook lists Google Docs as an integration; the others focus on Microsoft Word.
This comparison uses publicly available product, pricing, and review information. Features, pricing, and access terms may change, so buyers should verify current details directly with each vendor.
Generate rules from your checklist or signed agreements, then run them in Word. 25 free queries per user.