Document Automation
Product features
By practice area
By company size
Contract Review
PRODUCT FEATURES
Resources
LearN
Case Studies
Pricing
How Spellbook and Ivo differ on benchmarks, playbooks, audience, price and trial access, plus where Gavel Exec fits as a third choice.
Choose Spellbook if you're a transactional lawyer, at a firm or in-house, who wants a full contract suite in Word, terms measured against market data and a 7-day trial. Choose Ivo if you run an in-house legal team that wants review, benchmarks and playbooks drawn from contracts it has already signed. Neither vendor publishes a price.
Last checked November 3, 2026. Gavel publishes this comparison and makes Gavel Exec, which competes with both. Facts about Spellbook and Ivo are drawn from their own websites, help centers and Ivo's product summary. Spellbook's price is reported by Gavel customers since Spellbook keeps pricing private. Both vendors revise plans, so check terms with them before you sign.
Spellbook and Ivo
Gavel Exec
Gavel Exec is AI contract review, redlining, and drafting software for legal teams. It works in Microsoft Word and online, so attorneys can review contracts inside Word or use browser-based workflows for broader contract analysis.
Gavel Exec supports playbook-based review, redlining, drafting, benchmarking, batch analysis, and multi-document comparison. Playbooks can be generated with AI, built from uploaded files, created manually, or started from built-in playbooks created by practicing attorneys. Gavel Exec publishes pricing at $160 per user per month or $1,740 per user annually, and offers 25 free queries per user with no credit card required.
| Feature | Spellbook and Ivo | Gavel Exec |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Billing | ||
| Free Trial | ||
| AI Features | ||
| Playbooks | ||
| Word Integration | ||
| Support |
Every Spellbook and Ivo cell is drawn from that vendor's pages; the right-hand column adds Gavel Exec for comparison.
| Compared on | Spellbook | Ivo | Gavel Exec (third option) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Transactional lawyers at law firms and in-house teams who want a full contract suite in Word | In-house legal teams that want review and benchmarks grounded in their own signed contracts | Firms and in-house teams that want a published per-seat price and a free trial with no credit card or sales call |
| Where it runs | Word add-in with tracked redlines; Google Docs | Review add-in that redlines in Word and Google Docs; Intelligence repository | Word add-in with priority-ranked tracked changes; web app |
| Playbooks | Build from scratch, a model document, a plain-language description or expert starter playbooks; build service on the In-House Teams plan | Playbook Builder drafts from your repository or up to 15 uploads and cites each source; start from scratch; solutions attorneys help | Attorney-written built-in playbooks, or rules generated from checklists, spreadsheets or signed agreements |
| Benchmarking | Compare to Market: data pooled from thousands of similar agreements | Benchmarks: your own executed agreements, at least 10 comparable contracts per category | On-market, off-market or missing, by jurisdiction, industry and company size |
| Beyond review | Associate for multi-document work; Ask with legal-source research; Autonomous Contract Management for intake, routing and a searchable repository of signed contracts | Intelligence repository of up to one million contracts; Assistant for research; Collaborate for intake to signature | Batch analysis and multi-document comparison in the web app; no contract repository |
| Price | Not published; about $350 per user per month reported by Gavel customers | Not published; custom quote after a demo | $160 per user per month, or $1,740 per user per year |
| Free trial | 7 days from the website; extended trials possible for larger organizations | None listed; demo | 25 free queries per user, no credit card |
| Security | SOC 2 Type II; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and European Union AI Act compliance listed; zero data retention agreements with OpenAI and Anthropic; data centers in Canada and the United States | SOC 2 Type II; ISO 27001; ISO 42001 for AI management; no training on customer data | SOC 2 Type II; Zero Data Retention agreements with AI model providers; United States hosting by default |
Spellbook markets itself as "The complete contract AI suite," and its site description names transactional lawyers as the core audience. It runs as a Microsoft Word add-in, integrates with Google Docs, and counts 5,000+ in-house teams and law firms as users. Review marks up a contract "with every suggestion tracked," Draft works from scratch or from saved libraries, Ask answers questions and can search public legal sources such as CourtListener and CanLII, and Associate runs multi-document tasks.
Two newer products widen the suite. Compare to Market (listed as Market on Spellbook's feature page), announced in a Spellbook post last updated January 13, 2026, measures key terms against market data from thousands of similar agreements, right inside Word. Autonomous Contract Management, announced as generally available in a post last updated October 7, 2026, gathers incoming contracts from Gmail, Outlook, Slack and intake forms, routes them against your playbook rules and files every agreement once it's signed. Its repository lets you search the full contract history with cited answers, build tabular reports and add AI-generated columns, and it keeps monitoring each contract up to its renewal date.
Limits: Spellbook doesn't publish a price, and its January 2026 launch post says Compare to Market is free only when you contribute aggregate statistics from your contracts to the shared pool; keeping your data out of the pool costs an extra fee. Its help center also says only a playbook's creator can edit it, so colleagues clone a playbook to change it.
Ivo sells "Contract AI for the whole enterprise," aimed at in-house legal and business teams, and its homepage calls it "the #1 choice for Fortune 500 legal teams." Its Review add-in works in Microsoft Word and Google Docs, can run up to three playbooks in a single review, and adjusts its logic depending on whether you're reviewing the counterparty's paper or their redlines on yours. One click produces a configurable issues list, summary report or email memo.
Ivo is designed around your company's own contract history. Benchmarks compares each clause with your previously executed agreements, filtered by counterparty type, industry and governing law, and flags a provision that falls below your median. Intelligence holds a repository of up to one million contracts per organization, Assistant answers questions and researches law across more than 100 sources, and Collaborate routes agreements from intake through approval, negotiation and signature.
Limits: Ivo publishes no price and lists no trial, so evaluation starts with a demo. Benchmarks needs at least 10 comparable executed contracts in a category, and Ivo says meaningful benchmarks usually appear at around 25 to 50 agreements.
This is the sharpest difference between the two. Spellbook's Compare to Market shows how a term stacks up against thousands of similar agreements, with breakdowns by industry, jurisdiction and deal type. Ivo Benchmarks shows how a clause compares with what your company has already signed and drafts toward your 50th-percentile position. Spellbook is stronger when you need to know what the market will accept, and Ivo is stronger when consistency with your own precedent matters most.
Spellbook sells one plan for law firms and another for in-house teams, and says it is designed for both. Ivo's product summary names in-house legal teams, legal operations, general counsel, commercial counsel and procurement as its users, and Ivo's llms.txt, last updated July 2026, calls it "purpose-built for in-house legal departments at scaled enterprises" and says it is not meant for solo practitioners or small law firms. Collaborate brings business teams in through Salesforce and Slack, while Spellbook reaches them through Greenlight for procurement and Autonomous Contract Management intake from Slack, email and forms. A law firm will find a ready-made plan at Spellbook, while Ivo is the stronger fit for a legal department that wants the rest of the company inside the same workflow.
Neither vendor lists rates, so the practical difference is how you get in the door. Anyone can open Spellbook's 7-day trial from its website, and its help center describes month-to-month subscriptions alongside annual terms. Ivo's route runs through a demo and a custom quote, with no trial listed, and its llms.txt says there are no self-serve or month-to-month tiers. Spellbook is the easier of the two to try before a sales conversation.
Both build playbooks from documents. Spellbook can start from a model Word or PDF document, a plain-language description or starter playbooks generated by legal experts, and each rule can carry fallback positions, a risk level and a named approver. Ivo's Playbook Builder works from your repository or up to 15 uploads, turns additional uploaded contracts into fallback positions and cites the source of each position, and Review can apply three playbooks at once. Both can start a playbook from scratch. Ivo is stronger when your positions already live in executed agreements, and Spellbook gives you more starting points when they don't, including a plain-language description and expert starter playbooks.
Both vendors now sell more than an add-in. Spellbook's Associate handles multi-document work, and Autonomous Contract Management takes in contracts from email, Slack and intake forms, files each signed agreement and lets you search that history with cited answers and tabular reports. With Ivo's Intelligence, you describe in plain English what to pull from a repository of up to one million contracts, including contracts synced from systems such as SharePoint and Google Drive, and chart the results as dashboards, and Assistant can work across that repository. Ivo is stronger for questions about a large portfolio you already hold, and Spellbook is stronger for a suite that starts with drafting in Word and captures contracts as they come in.
Both report SOC 2 Type II. Ivo says it never trains AI models on customer data, and Spellbook says zero data retention keeps its model providers from training on or storing your data. Ivo adds ISO 27001 and, since September 2026, ISO 42001 for AI management, which makes it the stronger choice for a security team that requires either. Spellbook lists HIPAA, GDPR and European Union AI Act compliance on its security page, and it is more specific in public, naming OpenAI and Anthropic as the providers bound by its retention terms and saying where customer data is stored, so ask Ivo for the same details through its Trust Center.
Gavel Exec is AI contract review and drafting software that runs inside Microsoft Word as an add-in and on the web. It shares ground with each product above. As with Spellbook, both firms and legal departments buy it and it reads terms against market data; as with Ivo, your signed agreements can become the source of its playbook rules. It redlines the whole agreement as tracked changes ranked by priority, adds margin comments, lists missing terms and explains each change.
At a regulated financial services firm, Legal Counsel Omar Nakadi puts the saving at 40 to 60% of the review time on each contract.
Limits: Gavel Exec has no Google Docs add-in, which matters if your team drafts there, and it keeps no contract repository, so obligations and renewals go untracked across a portfolio. Case-law research needs a separate tool, you need the Word add-in to redline a particular document or build a playbook, and native connections to iManage and NetDocuments aren't offered yet.
For each product against Gavel Exec alone, see Spellbook vs Gavel Exec and Ivo vs Gavel Exec.
More comparisons: all Gavel comparisons, Ivo alternatives, Spellbook alternatives, Spellbook vs Harvey, Spellbook vs GC AI and our ranking of AI contract review tools for lawyers.
$160 per user per month, or $1,740 per user per year, with 25 free queries per user and no credit card. Turn agreements you've signed into playbook rules, see where each provision sits against the market, and get priority-ranked tracked changes in Microsoft Word.
Neither wins on every count. Spellbook suits deal lawyers, in a firm or a legal department, who want one Word suite with market benchmarks and a 7-day trial. Ivo suits corporate legal teams whose review and benchmarks should rest on their own signed agreements, with a repository that can query and chart up to one million contracts.
Neither puts a price on its website. Spellbook quotes by seat count, and you can expect about $350 per user per month, reported by Gavel customers. Ivo prices each deal after a demo. For reference, Gavel Exec's published rate is $160 per user per month, or $1,740 per user per year.
Spellbook does: 7 days, started from its website, with longer trials possible for larger organizations. Ivo's site shows no trial and points buyers to a demo request. Gavel Exec's trial is 25 free queries for every user, and starting it requires no credit card.
Compare to Market measures your terms against data pooled from thousands of similar agreements, with breakdowns by industry, jurisdiction and deal type. Ivo Benchmarks compares clauses with your own previously executed agreements, filtered by counterparty type, industry and governing law, and needs at least 10 comparable contracts in a category.
Both sell to in-house teams. Spellbook's In-House Teams plan includes a Playbook Build Service, and Greenlight lets procurement and supply chain staff run standard reviews of routine nondisclosure agreements and purchase orders against pre-approved playbooks. Ivo is built around the legal department, with a contract repository, benchmarks from your own deal history and Collaborate for intake through signature, which Ivo's homepage announces as now available.
Gavel Exec fits teams that want to check terms against the market, share playbooks with read-only or edit access and see a price before talking to anyone. GC AI, aimed at in-house counsel, charges $500 per month on its Individual plan and offers 14 days free without a credit card. Harvey reports 3,500+ customers across firms and legal departments, and its site leads with a demo request; see Harvey alternatives.
This comparison uses publicly available product, pricing, and review information. Features, pricing, and access terms may change, so buyers should verify current details directly with each vendor.
Open the same agreement in Word and compare all three sets of redlines. Each user starts with 25 free queries, and there's no credit card or sales call.