Plans & Pricing
About Gavel
Careers
Product Wishlist
Subdomain Log In
Manage Account
Experienced divorce experts share the nuances of Arkansas at-fault and no-fault divorce rules. Understand the basics of how you should decide which to pursue, what the grounds are for at-fault and no-fault divorces, and the pros and cons of each.
Easy intake and document automation to auto-populate your templates.
Divorce laws vary by state, and in Arkansas, understanding the distinction between at-fault and no-fault divorce is essential. Your choice between these two legal pathways can significantly impact property division, alimony, child custody, and the overall complexity of your case.
Both types of divorce have their advantages and challenges, and the decision will depend on your specific circumstances. This guide explores the differences between at-fault and no-fault divorces in Arkansas and how they may affect your legal proceedings.
An at-fault divorce requires the spouse filing for divorce to provide a legally recognized reason—or "ground"—for the marriage’s dissolution. These grounds establish blame for the failure of the relationship.
Arkansas allows several fault-based grounds for divorce, and proving these allegations can influence the outcome of property division, alimony, and even child custody. However, presenting evidence can make the process more contentious and lengthier.
Arkansas law (Arkansas Code § 9-12-301) recognizes the following fault-based grounds for divorce:
At-fault divorces require the filing spouse to prove their claims, which can make the process longer, costlier, and more emotionally challenging.
A no-fault divorce does not require proving that one spouse was responsible for the marriage’s breakdown. Instead, the couple must demonstrate that the marriage is irretrievably broken.
The primary requirement for a no-fault divorce in Arkansas is:
This approach makes divorce less contentious, as neither spouse must prove wrongdoing. However, the mandatory separation period can be a disadvantage for couples who want to move forward quickly.
Choosing whether to pursue an at-fault or no-fault divorce will depend on your goals and personal circumstances.
While many states offer both at-fault and no-fault divorce options, Arkansas has some unique requirements.
Withholding sex is not explicitly listed as a ground for divorce in Arkansas. However, it could fall under general indignities if it causes humiliation or emotional distress, or under impotence if a spouse is unable to consummate the marriage. Proving this in court requires demonstrating that the lack of intimacy made living together intolerable.
Yes, Arkansas law allows divorce based on incurable insanity if one spouse has been institutionalized or incapacitated for at least three consecutive years. To proceed with this claim, the filing spouse must provide medical evidence proving the condition is permanent and that the marriage is unsustainable.
Some individuals may consider religious beliefs when deciding whether to pursue a divorce. While Arkansas law does not base divorce decisions on religious grounds, biblical teachings sometimes align with legal grounds, such as adultery or abandonment. Those with strong religious convictions may also want to consult with a faith leader before proceeding with a legal divorce.
For many couples, the choice between at-fault and no-fault divorce depends on whether proving fault would provide a tangible legal or financial benefit.
Whether you pursue an at-fault or no-fault divorce, seeking legal advice is highly recommended. A family law attorney can help you:
Arkansas provides both at-fault and no-fault divorce options, and the right choice depends on your personal and legal circumstances.
Consulting with a divorce attorney is the best way to determine which option is right for you and to ensure that your rights are protected.
Turn your contract playbook into a real advantage—learn 4 ways top legal teams make theirs faster, smarter, and easier to use every day.
AI can speed up the review of complex Data Protection Agreements by flagging risky or unclear clauses before they become problems. With AI, you can run your own playbook directly in Word, instantly spotting issues like vague processing purposes, missing security measures, or weak liability terms.
How are lawyers using legal-grade AI directly in Microsoft Word to review employment contracts faster and more accurately? Gavel Exec flags missing or risky clauses, like unenforceable non-competes or vague severance terms, and offers redlines and benchmarking based on your internal standards. Whether you're reviewing third-party paper or updating templates, Gavel Exec gives you a head start without sacrificing legal judgment.