Document Automation
Gavel Workflows
By practice area
By company size
AI Contract Review
Resources
LearN
Case Studies
Pricing
%20(1).avif)
LegalOn's pre-built playbooks get you started fast, but the redlines often need heavy cleanup. This guide compares 5 LegalOn alternatives for 2026 — including Gavel Exec, CoCounsel, Ivo, StrongSuit, and Spellbook — by features, AI architecture, pricing, and redline quality.
Easy intake and document automation to auto-populate your templates.
If you're looking at LegalOn alternatives, you're probably not unhappy with the concept — pre-built playbooks, AI redlining inside Word, quick onboarding. Those are all good things. The issue is usually what comes out the other end.
LegalOn's redlines often aren't surgical enough to send to the counterparty without significant cleanup. Part of the reason is the platform doesn't draw on structured market data the way it could — its playbooks are based on its attorneys' views of what's standard, but there's no proprietary benchmarking by industry, jurisdiction, or company size to ground those positions in real deal data. The other part is context: LegalOn doesn't have a deep understanding of your organization's specific documents, negotiation patterns, or preferred language, so the output ends up feeling like what a competent but unfamiliar attorney would draft — technically reasonable, but not yours.
When you're reviewing 10, 20, 50 contracts a month and every one needs 20 minutes of cleanup, that's not a time-saver. It's a different kind of bottleneck.
This guide breaks down five alternatives to LegalOn, comparing features, AI architecture, pricing, and practical fit — so you can find a tool that delivers redlines you actually want to use.
Best for: In-house teams and law firms that want the convenience of pre-built playbooks plus the market data, document context, and precision that LegalOn is missing.
Gavel Exec is an AI-powered contract review and drafting assistant that works directly inside Microsoft Word. It redlines contracts, applies custom playbooks, drafts new provisions, and benchmarks clause language against proprietary market data — all built in partnership with practicing deal lawyers. Over 2,000 legal organizations use Gavel, from solo practitioners to Am Law 100 firms and enterprise in-house departments.
Like LegalOn, Gavel Exec comes with pre-built playbooks for common contract types so you're productive on day one. The difference is everything else that feeds into the quality of the output.
The core frustration with LegalOn is that the redlines need too much work before they're ready. That's not a playbook problem — it's a data and context problem. LegalOn's playbooks are based on what its attorneys think is standard, but they're not informed by structured market data specific to your deal type, and they don't reflect how your team negotiates. Gavel Exec closes both of those gaps.
Proprietary market data that's actually granular. Gavel Exec maintains market intelligence across industries, jurisdictions, and company sizes for a variety of document types. When you're reviewing a limitation of liability cap in a mid-market healthcare SaaS deal, Gavel can benchmark that against data that's filtered to deals like yours — not a generic standard based on one attorney team's view of what's reasonable. That data flows into the playbook analysis and the redline suggestions, making the output more defensible and more precise.
Deep understanding of your documents. This is the biggest gap in LegalOn's approach. Gavel Exec can pull from your repository of executed contracts, templates, and prior redlines to understand your team's negotiation patterns, preferred language, and fallback positions. It doesn't just run your contract through a generic playbook — it understands how your organization handles these provisions and drafts accordingly. The result is redlines that sound like your senior associate wrote them, not like a competent stranger took a first pass.
Surgical redlines, less noise. LegalOn surfaces a high volume of risk flags ranked Low/Medium/High, which in theory sounds helpful but in practice means sorting through a lot of issues that don't matter for your specific deal. Gavel Exec's playbook-driven approach is more targeted — it flags what matters based on your positions and your market context, and the suggested redlines are specific and practice-ready. Less triage, more usable output.
Both tools have pre-built playbooks, so you're not starting from zero. But when you need to go beyond the defaults — and you will — the paths diverge.
LegalOn lets you customize its playbooks, but the tools are limited. Gavel Exec gives you multiple options: AI-powered playbook generation that can create structured playbooks from your existing documents and positions, a self-serve builder for crafting fully custom playbooks using a three-part format (requirement, how to identify issues, redline guidance), and Gavel's team will build custom playbooks for you for free as part of your plan. You can also use all three approaches together. The point is you're never stuck with someone else's idea of what your playbook should look like.
Gavel Exec uses frontier AI models combined with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), structured playbook data, proprietary market intelligence, and your organization's document context to ground every output. The three-layer approach — playbooks + market data + your documents and experience — gives the model explicit instructions, relevant benchmarks, and organizational memory working together. More context means more precision. That's why the redlines come back tighter and more usable than what you get from tools operating with less information about your specific situation. (For more on how AI fits into legal workflows, check out our guide on rules-based automation vs. generative AI.)
Gavel Exec is $145/month per user on an annual plan ($1,740/year), or $160/month with no lock-in. Includes free playbook builds, onboarding, training, and unlimited support. LegalOn starts at approximately $3,500/user/year — roughly double. Start your free trial →
Best for: Firms already invested in the Thomson Reuters ecosystem that want AI layered on top of Westlaw and Practical Law research.
CoCounsel is Thomson Reuters' AI legal assistant. It recently hit one million professionals with access across 107 countries — though that number reflects subscription access, not necessarily active contract review users.
As a LegalOn alternative, CoCounsel offers something LegalOn doesn't: deep integration with legal research databases. If your workflow requires frequent case law lookups alongside contract review, having both in one platform has advantages. The next-generation version entering beta in 2026 promises agentic workflows for multi-step task execution.
But CoCounsel's contract-specific capabilities — playbooks, redlining, clause-level precision — are less developed than what LegalOn or Gavel Exec offer. The platform operates through its own portal rather than natively in Word, adding friction. And the pricing reflects the full Thomson Reuters stack — you're paying for Westlaw and Practical Law bundled in, making this one of the most expensive options for teams whose primary need is contract work.
Best for: Large in-house teams that want white-glove playbook onboarding and contract portfolio intelligence alongside AI redlining.
Ivo raised $55M in Series B funding in early 2026 and counts Uber, Shopify, Atlassian, and Canva among its customers. The company reports 75% time savings on contract review and claims strong win rates in competitive evaluations.
As a LegalOn alternative, Ivo goes deeper on playbook infrastructure and adds a contract intelligence layer that LegalOn lacks — analyzing your full contract library, discovering relationships between agreements, and surfacing portfolio-wide patterns. The playbook onboarding is hands-on, with Ivo's attorneys building your playbooks for you.
The tradeoffs: you're reliant on Ivo's team for playbook creation and updates, which can slow you down. There's no AI playbook generation or self-serve builder. The platform focuses on in-house teams — law firms aren't the target. And the pricing is enterprise-level and undisclosed. Ivo solves some of LegalOn's depth problems but introduces new constraints around control and cost that Gavel Exec doesn't have.
Best for: Solo practitioners and small firms that need both litigation and contract tools in one affordable subscription.
StrongSuit rebranded from Callidus Legal AI in late 2025 and is the most budget-friendly option on this list. It covers litigation and transactional workflows with a proprietary database of over 11 million US cases, automated case validation, and contract review — starting at $149/month.
As a LegalOn alternative, StrongSuit trades playbook depth for breadth and affordability. If you're a litigator who also handles contracts, or a small firm that needs research, drafting, and contract tools in one subscription, the all-in-one approach has appeal.
But StrongSuit is fundamentally a litigation platform that added contract review. No meaningful pre-built playbooks, no proprietary market data, no document repository learning. The contract redlines are functional but lack the precision of tools built specifically for transactional work. If you moved away from LegalOn because the output wasn't precise enough, StrongSuit won't solve that problem.
Best for: Teams that want a Word-native contract review experience with anonymized market benchmarking data.
Spellbook is used by over 4,000 legal teams for commercial transactional work. It operates inside Microsoft Word and offers drafting, redlining, and a "Compare to Market" feature that benchmarks clauses against anonymized data from its user base.
As a LegalOn alternative, Spellbook takes a different approach to personalization — "preference learning" that adapts over time instead of structured playbooks. The "Compare to Market" feature gives you benchmarking data filtered by jurisdiction and deal type, which is a dimension LegalOn doesn't offer.
But Spellbook has the same fundamental problem that sends people looking for LegalOn alternatives: the redlines feel generic and need significant cleanup. Preference learning from individual edits is slow and imprecise compared to structured playbooks. There's no AI playbook generation, no document repository learning, and the market data is anonymized and aggregated rather than filtered by industry and company size. At approximately $300–350/month per user with minimum contract terms, Spellbook is the most expensive option on this list — more than double the cost of Gavel Exec for output that many teams find isn't meaningfully better than what they left.
If LegalOn's output isn't meeting your expectations, the solution is a tool that addresses the specific gaps creating that problem. Here's what to focus on.
This is the question that matters. If every review requires 20 minutes of cleanup, you're not saving time — you're shifting the work. Gavel Exec produces more surgical redlines because it has more to work with: structured playbooks, curated market data for your specific deal context, and your organization's actual documents and negotiation patterns.
Playbooks based on attorney opinion are a starting point. Playbooks informed by proprietary market data filtered by industry, jurisdiction, and company size are something else entirely. Gavel Exec's market intelligence makes the benchmarking — and the redlines it produces — more defensible and more relevant to your deals.
LegalOn adapts to your risk preferences but doesn't pull from your document repository. Gavel Exec can analyze your executed contracts, templates, and prior redlines to understand how your team negotiates. That's the difference between generic output and redlines that feel like yours.
Pre-built playbooks are great for day one. But every team's positions are different, and the ability to go deeper matters. Gavel Exec gives you AI playbook generation, self-serve tools, and free custom builds from Gavel's team — so you're never limited to someone else's idea of what's standard.
LegalOn starts at approximately $3,500/user/year. Spellbook runs $300–350/month. Ivo doesn't disclose pricing. Gavel Exec is $145/month annually ($1,740/year) or $160/month with no commitment — including free playbook builds and unlimited support. Better redlines at a better price.
Gavel Exec gives you pre-built playbooks, AI playbook generation, proprietary market data, and AI that learns from your documents — producing surgical redlines in your voice, directly in Word. Day-one value and long-term precision. For in-house teams and law firms alike.
Start with 25 free queries. No credit card required.
Both offer pre-built playbooks and Word integration. The difference is what feeds the redlines. Gavel Exec layers proprietary market data filtered by industry, jurisdiction, and company size on top of your playbooks, and it pulls from your document repository to understand how your team actually negotiates. The result is tighter, more precise redlines that need less cleanup — at roughly half the cost.
Yes. Gavel Exec comes with pre-built playbooks for common contract types, developed by practicing deal lawyers — so you're productive on day one, just like LegalOn. The difference is what comes next: AI-powered playbook generation, self-serve building tools, and free custom playbook builds from Gavel's team give you paths to go deeper that LegalOn doesn't offer.
Yes. Gavel Exec covers NDAs, MSAs, SaaS agreements, vendor contracts, asset purchase agreements, employment agreements, and more — across corporate, real estate, and other transactional practice areas. And because you can generate playbooks with AI or build custom ones, you're not limited to a fixed list of supported contract types.
Gavel Exec is $145/month per user annually ($1,740/year), or $160/month with no lock-in. LegalOn starts at approximately $3,500/user/year for individuals, with team plans around $40,000 for five users. Gavel includes free playbook builds, onboarding, training, and unlimited support in every plan.
Yes. Gavel Exec can pull from your repository of executed contracts, templates, and prior redlines to understand your team's voice, positions, and negotiation patterns. The more context you provide, the more precise the output — which is the core advantage over tools that only apply generic playbook rules.
Not getting the contract review you want from Ivo? We review 5 alternatives to their AI contract review, including features, pricing, training data, and more.
Frustrated with Spellbook? We review the top Spellbook alternatives legal professionals are using, as we compare their accuracy, features, pricing, and how to switch easily.
Contract AI for renewable energy lawyers accelerates review of PPAs, EPC contracts, interconnection agreements, and project finance documents. Energy-focused AI like Gavel Exec helps identify bankability issues, flag non-standard risk allocation, and produce clean redlines and negotiation memos without replacing legal judgment.
